Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2026-11-11 Origin: Site
We measure quality before we name it. That is the difference between a buyer who gets the rice they expected and one who spends a season arguing about Grade 1. When we discuss a Rice Sorting Machine for Improved White Rice Processing Quality, we ask what the buyer's customer tests, how often, and who holds the sample. Without a method and a sampling point, a quality claim is marketing, not a contract term.
This guide sets out the quality schedule we propose: which fractions grading separates, where optical sorting would sit if in scope, how to write broken rate as a measurable figure, and why destoning and metal removal belong upstream. Our pages list rice graders, separators and sorting machines and describe low broken rates and Grade 1 output. They do not publish percentages, test methods, whiteness values or sorter parameters, and we will keep those gaps visible.
Two buyers can use the word sorting and mean different things. One means separating whole kernels from broken ones by length and thickness. The other means removing discoloured grains optically. Our published range covers the first and uses sorting as a category term; we have no colour sorter product page and no optical parameters. We ask which meaning the buyer has before we put anything on an order.
That distinction changes the equipment list, the building space and the acceptance test. Size grading is a mechanical step with screens and graders; optical sorting is a separate machine with its own settings and reject stream. Our rice grading guide discusses the mechanical route for smaller mills, and the grader selection guide goes further into choosing that equipment. Neither should be read as a promise about colour defects.
In the lines we describe, grading follows cleaning and husking and comes after whitening in the larger plants. The 30T plant lists a grader alongside its cleaner, husker, polisher and blowers, so the graded product is an outlet of a train rather than an attachment to a single machine. We ask buyers to name the size bands they sell into, because the number of bands decides how many grading passes the layout needs.
The rice separator and the graders in our single-machine range are the items we can quote from published pages. What we do not publish are screen slot widths, cut points or the yield of each fraction. Those depend on the paddy variety and on how much breakage the previous stages produced. We ask for a sample of the buyer's own grain at the trial, then write the agreed bands into the order.
Grading bands and where each fraction goes | |||
Fraction | How it is separated | Commercial outlet | Status on our pages |
|---|---|---|---|
Whole kernels | Length and thickness grading | Premium white rice | Graders listed; cuts not published |
Large broken | Size grading | Lower-price rice | Grading guides published; cuts not published |
Small broken | Separated at the mill outlet | Feed or re-milling | Single mill page names the stream |
Fine chaff and bran | Air separation and fan | Feed | Named on SB and single mill pages |
Stone and metal | Screen, magnet, destoner | Reject | Functions published, no limits |
If a buyer needs discoloured or defective kernels removed, that is a legitimate requirement and we treat it as a scope question. Optical sorting belongs after whitening and grading, when the product stream is already sized and clean, and it needs its own reject handling. But we publish no colour sorter page, no camera specification, no throughput and no rejection rate. We cannot quote one from our catalogue, and we will not imply it is included in a standard rice plant.
The honest route is to put it in the RFQ as a separate, named item and ask for written confirmation of whether it is in the supply scope, what it must remove and how the result will be tested. Our rice mill machine range shows the plants and combined units we do publish. Where a buyer's customer specification calls for optical sorting, we would rather see that stated plainly than have it assumed at installation.
Our SB page describes a low broken rate, and the single rice mill page describes separating small broken rice from the main output. Neither gives a percentage or a test method. A phrase like that is useful for describing a machine, but it cannot be an acceptance criterion. If a buyer needs a broken rate in a contract, the number has to come with a sieve, a sample mass, a weighing method and a defined sampling point.
The broken rice reduction guide covers the handling and process side of that problem. We ask buyers to measure their own broken fraction for a week before setting a target, because variety, moisture and whitener setting all move it. A figure copied from a different mill will be wrong on day one. We would rather agree a realistic baseline at commissioning than a flattering number that fails later.
A grader cannot fix what cleaning missed. The SB flow starts with a vibrating screen and a magnet, and our page names stones, metal and large impurities as the targets. The 15T plant description lists a destoner for dust and stones, and the 30T plant lists a cleaner for the same purpose. That order is deliberate: a stone reaching the rubber rollers damages them and carries the fault into every later stage.
The destoner is a real item in our single-machine range, and we ask for it on the drawing rather than as an optional extra. We do not publish a destoning efficiency or a screen mesh size, so the acceptance check is a practical one: sample the stream before husking and inspect it. The moisture meter belongs at intake too, since incoming moisture changes both breakage and cleaning behaviour.
Our SB page states that the finished rice reaches Grade 1 standard or above. We stand by that as a description of the unit's capability, but we do not publish the standard being referenced, the test method, or a tolerance for defects. A buyer selling into a market with its own Grade 1 definition needs that standard written into the order, with the buyer's own test method and sample size named beside it.
We ask who issues the certificate, who keeps the reference sample and what happens when two labs disagree. Those are commercial questions, not machine questions, and they are cheaper to settle before shipment. We publish the flow, the outlets and the descriptive claim. The grade definition, the broken percentage, the whiteness value and the foreign matter limit are not published and must be agreed in writing with a test method.
A single sample at the finished goods outlet cannot tell you where a quality problem started. We propose three: one at intake, before cleaning; one after husking and whitening, before grading; and one at the finished goods outlet after packing. Comparing them shows whether the incoming paddy, the milling stages or the grading stage is responsible for a change. It also gives both sides a record to refer to.
We ask the operator to label each sample with the date, shift, model setting and raw material lot, and keep them for an agreed period. A handful in a bag costs nothing and makes a drifting trend visible across a week. We do not publish a sampling frequency or retention period; those belong in the buyer's own quality plan. At commissioning we set a baseline with the buyer's grain and hand over a written check order.
The schedule we propose is short enough to fit on one page: the indicator, the test method, the sampling point, the frequency, the tolerance and who records it. Where a figure is not in our published data, the schedule says so and assigns it to the RFQ rather than leaving it blank. That is the part buyers appreciate most, because it separates what can be quoted from what has to be negotiated.
Quality schedule we propose for the order | |||
Indicator | Method | Frequency | Published status |
|---|---|---|---|
Broken rate | Agreed sieve and weighing | Three samples per shift | Not published |
Grade 1 claim | Buyer's named test method | Per lot | Described, no method published |
Moisture | Meter reading at intake | Per intake batch | Meter listed; limits not published |
Foreign matter | Visual and magnet check | Per shift | Functions published, no limit |
Whiteness | Buyer's method | Per lot | Not published |
Optical defects | Confirm scope first | Per lot | No sorter page published |
We would rather a buyer reject a clause than sign one neither side can test. Send us your customer's specification and the standard they use, and we will mark which items we can quote from published pages, which are listed accessories, and which need written confirmation. That is a slower start than a one-line quotation, but it is the only version that survives the first disputed lot.
A Rice Sorting Machine for Improved White Rice Processing Quality is only as good as the definition of quality behind it. Length and thickness grading, destoning, metal removal, broken rate and Grade 1 all need a method and a sampling point before they can appear in an order. We have set out the schedule we use and marked every place where our own pages stop.
Tehold International supplies grain cleaning, drying, storage, milling and packaging equipment as turnkey packages, and we would rather write a test method into your order than quote a broken rate we have not published. We publish the SB flow, the grading and separator range, and descriptive quality claims. Percentages, cut points, whiteness, grade standards and optical sorting parameters are absent from our pages and have to be settled in writing before the order.
No, and that point needs stating early. Sorting is a category label on our site for mechanical length and thickness grading, destoning and broken kernel separation; we do not list an optical colour sorter or any of its settings. If your customer's specification calls for one, name it as a separate line in the RFQ and ask us to confirm in writing whether it falls inside the supply scope.
We cannot put a number to it from our pages. The SB description calls the broken rate low and the single mill page names a small broken stream, yet neither states a percentage or a test procedure. Grain variety, moisture, handling and how the whitener is set all move that figure. If a contract needs one, we fix a sieve, sample mass, sampling point and a baseline at commissioning.
It is a descriptive claim on our SB page. We do not publish the standard referenced, the test method or a defect tolerance. If your market has its own Grade 1 definition, put that standard, the test method and the sample size into the order with the buyer's certificate procedure. Otherwise the phrase is not an acceptance criterion either side can enforce.
Because one sample at the outlet cannot show where a problem began. We propose intake before cleaning, after husking and whitening before grading, and at the finished goods outlet. Comparing them separates incoming paddy quality from milling and grading effects. We set the baseline at commissioning with the buyer's grain; sampling frequency and retention belong to the buyer's own plan.
The flow, the grading and separator equipment, the destoner, the moisture meter and the descriptive claims on our pages. Cut points, screen slot widths, broken percentages, whiteness, foreign matter limits, destoning efficiency and optical sorter parameters are not published. We mark those in the quality schedule as RFQ items rather than fill them with catalogue numbers.